References

Abadie, A. (2021). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(2), 391–425.

Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113–132.

Alamos-Concha, P., Pattyn, V., Cambré, B., & Rihoux, B. (2026). Increasing internal and external validity through a multimethod evaluation with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and process tracing: The case of training transfer effectiveness in flemish SMEs. Evaluation Review, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X251352020

ALNAP. (2016). Evaluation of humanitarian action guide. ALNAP/ODI.

Arrimada, M., Torrance, M., & Fidalgo, R. (2018). Supporting first-grade writers who fail to learn: Multiple single-case evaluation of a Response to Intervention approach. Reading and Writing, 31(4), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9817-x

Bamanyaki, P. A., & Holvoet, N. (2016). Integrating theory-based evaluation and process tracing in the evaluation of civil society gender budget initiatives. Evaluation, 22(1), 72–90.

Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints (2nd ed.). Sage.

Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Allyn; Bacon.

Baumgartner, M. (2009). Inferring causal complexity. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(1), 71–101.

Baumgartner, M., & Ambühl, M. (2020). Causal modeling with multi-value and fuzzy-set coincidence analysis. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(3), 526–542.

Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.

Befani, B. (2020). Diagnostic evaluation and bayesian updating: Practical solutions to common problems. Evaluation, 26(4), 499–515.

Befani, B., Elsenbroich, C., & Badham, J. (2021). Diagnostic evaluation with simulated probabilities. Evaluation, 27(1), 102–115.

Befani, B., & Mayne, J. (2014). Process tracing and contribution analysis: A combined approach to generative causal inference for impact evaluation. IDS Bulletin, 45(6), 17–36.

Befani, B., & O’Donnell, M. (2016). Choosing appropriate evaluation methods: A tool for assessment and selection. Bond.

Befani, B., & Stedman-Bryce, G. (2017). Process tracing and Bayesian updating for impact evaluation. Evaluation, 23(1), 42–60.

Bernal, J. L., Cummins, S., & Gasparrini, A. (2017). Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(1), 348–355.

Beutel, D., Tangen, D., & Carrington, S. (2023). Backward mapping from outcomes: Using a realist evaluation lens to evaluate an international aid program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102201

Blackman, T., Wistow, J., & Byrne, D. (2011). A qualitative comparative analysis of factors associated with trends in narrowing health inequalities in England. Social Science & Medicine, 72(12), 1965–1974.

Blundo-Canto, G., Läderach, P., Waldock, J., & Camacho, K. (2017). Learning through monitoring, evaluation and adaptations of the Outcome Harvesting tool. Cahiers Agricultures, 26, 65004. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017054

Boissat, L., Thomas-Walters, L., & Veríssimo, D. (2021). Nature documentaries as catalysts for change: Mapping out the “blackfish effect.” People and Nature, 3(6), 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10221

Bowen, S., & Zwi, A. B. (2005). Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: A framework for action. PLoS Medicine, 2(7), e166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020166

Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed.). Rowman; Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216385530

Brandão, F., Befani, B., Soares-Filho, J., Rajão, R., & Garcia, E. (2023). How to halt deforestation in the Amazon? A Bayesian process-tracing approach. Land Use Policy, 133, 106866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106866

Brück, T., Ferguson, N. T. N., Izzi, V., & Stojetz, W. (2016). Measuring the impact of humanitarian assistance: A review of current practice. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-016-0018-6

Bulté, I., & Onghena, P. (2009). Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs: An extension of the SCRT-R package. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 477–485.

Bush, K., & Duggan, C. (2014). How can research contribute to peacebuilding? Peacebuilding, 2(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2014.887617

Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting causes and using them: Approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge University Press.

Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press.

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.

Chemouni, B. (2018). The political path to universal health coverage: Power, ideas and community-based health insurance in rwanda. World Development, 106, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.023

Choi, T., Sarkar, M., Bonham, M., Brock, T., Brooks, I. A., Diug, B., Ilic, D., Kumar, A., Lau, W.-M., Lindley, J., Morphet, J., Simmons, M., Volders, E., White, P. J., Wright, C., & Palermo, C. (2023). Using contribution analysis to evaluate health professions and health sciences programs. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 1146832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1146832

Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830.

Copestake, J. (2014). Credible impact evaluation in complex contexts: Confirmatory and exploratory approaches. Evaluation, 20(4), 412–427.

Court, J., & Young, J. (2003). Bridging research and policy: Insights from 50 case studies (Working Paper No. 213). Overseas Development Institute.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Damschroder, L. J., Miech, E. J., Freitag, M. B., Evans, R., Burns, J., et al. (2022). Facility-level program components leading to population impact: A coincidence analysis of obesity treatment options within the veterans health administration. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(11), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac051

Dart, J., & Davies, R. (2003). A dialogical, story-based evaluation tool: The Most Significant Change technique. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), 137–155.

Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The “most significant change” (MSC) technique: A guide to its use.

Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Social Science & Medicine, 210, 2–21.

Delahais, T., & Toulemonde, J. (2012). Applying contribution analysis: Lessons from five years of practice. Evaluation, 18(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012450810

Department for International Development. (2012). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations (Working Paper No. 38). DFID.

Doi, L., Wason, D., Malden, S., & Jepson, R. (2018). Supporting the health and well-being of school-aged children through a school nurse programme: A realist evaluation. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 664. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3480-4

Downes, A., Novicki, E., & Howard, J. (2018). Using the contribution analysis approach to evaluate science impact: A case study of the national institute for occupational safety and health. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018767046

Edgington, E. S., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization tests (4th ed.). Chapman; Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011814

Epstein, L. H., & Dallery, J. (2022). The family of single-case experimental designs. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(SI3).

Flynn, R., Mrklas, K., Campbell, A., et al. (2021). Contextual factors and mechanisms that influence sustainability: A realist evaluation of two scaled, multi-component interventions. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 1194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07214-5

Fox, C., Gellen, S., Morris, S., Ozan, J., & Crockford, J. (2022). Impact evaluation with small cohorts: Methodology guidance. TASO.

Garbarino, S., & Holland, J. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative methods in impact evaluation and measuring results [Issues Paper]. GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). Open University Press.

Gilmore, B., McAuliffe, É., Power, J., & Vallières, F. (2019). Data analysis and synthesis within a realist evaluation: Toward more transparent methodological approaches. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919859754

Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.

Greenhalgh, T., Humphrey, C., Hughes, J., Macfarlane, F., Butler, C., & Pawson, R. (2009). How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London. Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), 391–416.

Greenhalgh, T., & Wieringa, S. (2011). Is it time to drop the “knowledge translation” metaphor? A critical literature review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 501–509.

Griffin, J. T., Hollingsworth, T. D., Okell, L. C., Churcher, T. S., White, M., Hinsley, W., Bousema, T., Drakeley, C. J., Ferguson, N. M., Basáñez, M.-G., & Ghani, A. C. (2010). Reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in Africa: A model-based evaluation of intervention strategies. PLoS Medicine, 7(8), e1000324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000324

Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926.

Guyatt, G., Sackett, D., Taylor, D. W., Chong, J., Roberts, R., & Pugsley, S. (1986). Determining optimal therapy: Randomized trials in individual patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 314(14), 889–892.

Hafner, T., & Shiffman, J. (2012). The emergence of global attention to health systems strengthening. Health Policy and Planning, 28(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs023

Hampton, L. H., Harty, M., Fuller, E. A., & Kaiser, A. P. (2019). Enhanced milieu teaching for children with autism spectrum disorder in south africa. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(6), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1559357

Hennessy, E., Ornstein, J. T., Economos, C. D., Herzog, J. B., Lynskey, V., Coffield, E., & Hammond, R. A. (2016). Designing an agent-based model for childhood obesity interventions: A case study of ChildObesity180. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13, 150414. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.150414

Herrett, E., Williamson, E., Brack, K., Beaumont, D., Perkins, A., et al. (2021). Statin treatment and muscle symptoms: Series of randomised, placebo controlled n-of-1 trials. BMJ, n135. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n135

Ho, L. S., Labrecque, G., Batonon, I., Salsi, V., & Ratnayake, R. (2015). Effects of a community scorecard on improving the local health system in eastern democratic republic of congo: Qualitative evidence using the most significant change technique. Conflict and Health, 9, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0055-4

Holden, S., Ferguson, M., Brimblecombe, J., & Palermo, C. (2015). Can a community of practice equip public health nutritionists to work with remote retail to improve the food supply? Rural and Remote Health. https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh3464

Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.

Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.

Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macaulay, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., et al. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15, 725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1

Johnson, K., Greenseid, L. O., Toal, S. A., King, J. A., Lawrenz, F., & Volkov, B. (2009). Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 377–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214009341660

Kahwati, L., Jacobs, S., Kane, H., Lewis, M., Viswanathan, M., & Golin, C. E. (2016). Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention. Systematic Reviews, 5, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y

Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kien, C., Grillich, L., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., & Schoberberger, R. (2018). Pathways leading to success and non-success: A process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity health promotion program applying fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. BMC Public Health, 18, 1386. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6284-x

Knott, C. L., Miech, E. J., Slade, J., Woodard, N., Robinson-Shaneman, B.-J., & Huq, M. (2022). Evaluation of organizational capacity in the implementation of a church-based cancer education program. Global Implementation Research and Applications, 2(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-021-00033-0

Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38.

Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736

Kuruvilla, S., Schweitzer, J., Bishai, D., Chowdhury, S., Caramani, D., et al. (2014). Success factors for reducing maternal and child mortality. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(7), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.14.138131

Lavis, J. N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., McLeod, C. B., & Abelson, J. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? The Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221–248.

Leeuw, F. L., & Furubo, J.-E. (2008). Evaluation systems: What are they and why study them? Evaluation, 14(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007087537

Leeuw, F. L., & Vaessen, J. (2009). Impact evaluations and development: NONIE guidance on impact evaluation. Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation.

Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452.

Limsuan, A. A., & Ferrer, A. J. G. (2021). Outcome harvesting in a climate-smart village: The case of Guinayangan, Quezon, Philippines (2014–2020) (Working Paper No. 393). CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture; Food Security. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/116444

Lomas, J. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ, 334(7585), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE

Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4), 245–264.

Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.

Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1), 1–24.

Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280.

Merrill, J. A., Deegan, M., Wilson, R. V., Kaushal, R., & Fredericks, K. (2013). A system dynamics evaluation model: Implementation of health information exchange for public health reporting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e1), e131–e138. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001289

Mill, J. S. (1843). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. John W. Parker.

Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A “contributions” approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv016

Muralidharan, K., Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2016). Building state capacity: Evidence from biometric smartcards in India. American Economic Review, 106(10), 2895–2929.

Naylor, C. E., & Bower, E. (2005). Modified constraint-induced movement therapy for young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A pilot study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162205000721

Neyman, J. (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: Essay on principles, section 9. Statistical Science, 5(4), 465–472.

Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.

OECD. (2012). Evaluating peacebuilding activities in settings of conflict and fragility: Improving learning for results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264106802-en

OECD-DAC Network on Development Evaluation. (2019). Better criteria for better evaluation: Revised evaluation criteria definitions and principles for use. OECD.

Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 2.

OpenAlex. (2026). OpenAlex API documentation: works. https://developers.openalex.org/api-reference/works

Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006

Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006

Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge.

Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.

Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail — systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell.

Puri, J., Aladysheva, A., Iversen, V., Ghorpade, Y., & Brück, T. (2017). Can rigorous impact evaluations improve humanitarian assistance? Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(4), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2017.1388267

Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.

Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.

Railer, J., Stockley, D., Flynn, L., Hastings-Truelove, A., & Hussain, A. (2020). Using outcome harvesting: Assessing the efficacy of CBME implementation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(5), 1564–1571. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13359

Raimondo, E. (2020). Getting practical with causal mechanisms: The application of process-tracing under real-world evaluation constraints. New Directions for Evaluation, 2020(167), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20430

Rohlfing, I., & Schneider, C. Q. (2018). A unifying framework for causal analysis in set-theoretic multimethod research. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 37–63.

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.

Salazar, G., Mills, M., & Veríssimo, D. (2018). Qualitative impact evaluation of a social marketing campaign for conservation. Conservation Biology, 33(3), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13218

Schneider, C. Q., & Rohlfing, I. (2013). Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(4), 559–597.

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2006). Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 751–786.

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418.

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Scriven, M. (2008). A summative evaluation of RCT methodology: And an alternative approach to causal research. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5(9), 11–24.

Sempé, L. (2026). Research methods in fragile and conflict-affected settings: An evidence gap map [Evidence Gap Map]. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).

Sempé, L., Pande, R., Kelly, L., Anwar, A., Echt, L., & Jessani, N. (2025). A conceptual framework for evidence-informed policymaking [Framework narrative]. Foreign, Commonwealth; Development Office Research Commissioning Centre / International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie). https://www.grtd.fcdo.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/RCC_EIPM_Framework_narrative.pdf

Shamseer, L., Sampson, M., Bukutu, C., Schmid, C. H., Nikles, J., Tate, R., Johnston, B. C., Zucker, D., Shadish, W. R., Kravitz, R., Guyatt, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & Vohra, S. (2015). CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 350, h1793.

Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 510–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029312

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill.

Stern, E., Stame, N., Mayne, J., Forss, K., Davies, R., & Befani, B. (2012). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations (Working Paper No. 38). DFID.

Tanious, R., Manolov, R., Onghena, P., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2024). Single-case experimental designs: The importance of randomization and replication. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-024-00312-8

Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., Horner, R., Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T., McDonald, S., Sampson, M., Shamseer, L., Togher, L., Albin, R., Backman, C., Douglas, J., Evans, J. J., Gast, D., Manolov, R., … Wilson, B. (2016). The single-case reporting guideline in BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000026

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.

The Evaluation Gap Working Group. (2006). When will we ever learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation. Center for Global Development.

Thiem, A. (2022). Beyond the facts: Limited empirical diversity and causal inference in qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882463

Ton, G. (2017). Contribution analysis of a Bolivian innovation grant fund: Mixing methods to verify relevance, efficiency and effectiveness. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(1), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2016.1231702

United Nations Evaluation Group. (2018). Guidance on evaluating institutional gender mainstreaming. UNEG.

Vaessen, J., Lemire, S., & Befani, B. (2020). Evaluation of international development interventions: An overview of approaches and methods. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank.

Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Cornell University Press.

Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Knowledge brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence & Policy, 5(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426409X463811

Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.

Welle, K., & Punton, M. (2015). Straws-in-the-wind, hoops and smoking guns: What can process tracing offer to impact evaluation? [CDI Practice Paper 10]. Institute of Development Studies.

White, H. (2014). Current challenges in impact evaluation. In Evaluation and facilitation: New directions for evaluation (Vol. 144, pp. 11–24). https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20102

White, H., & Phillips, D. (2012). Addressing attribution of cause and effect in small n impact evaluations: Towards an integrated framework (Working Paper No. 15). International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).

Wilder, L., & Walpole, M. (2008). Measuring social impacts in conservation: Experience of using the Most Significant Change method. Oryx, 42(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605307000671

Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2019). Statistical analysis in small-n designs: Using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness. Aphasiology, 33(1), 1–30.

Wilson-Grau, R., & Britt, H. (2012). Outcome harvesting. Ford Foundation.

Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses. BMC Medicine, 11, 21.

Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.